The Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration is developing a major redesign of Route 1, or Baltimore Avenue, between MD 193/University Boulevard and Sunnyside Avenue.
The approximately 1.9-mile project represents Phases 2 and 3 of the broader Route 1 improvement program. Phase 1, covering Baltimore Avenue from College Avenue to MD 193, was completed in 2024. The next phases would extend roadway, pedestrian, bicycle, transit and landscaping improvements north through College Park and into Beltsville.
The preliminary plan was presented at a public informational workshop on June 24, 2026, at Beltsville Academy. Residents and other corridor users were invited to review the proposed improvements, speak with SHA representatives and provide comments.
The current plan is only at the 5% design stage, meaning that it is an early concept and remains subject to significant changes. SHA expects the project to reach the 30% design milestone in winter 2027–2028. The workshop materials show the design phase extending from 2025 through 2031, while construction is identified as a future and currently unfunded phase.
Why is Route 1 being redesigned?
The purpose of the project is to improve accessibility, safety and traffic operations throughout the corridor.
Today, much of this portion of Route 1 consists of a five-lane, undivided roadway with two travel lanes in each direction and a continuous center turn lane. Posted speeds vary between 30 and 40 mph. The road passes residential neighborhoods, parks, hotels, restaurants, stores, community-serving businesses, institutional properties and industrial areas. It also passes through the complicated I-95/I-495 interchange.
The proposed redesign seeks to create a more organized corridor for motorists while providing more continuous and separated facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Much of the continuous center turn lane would be replaced by raised or landscaped medians and dedicated turn lanes at selected locations. This could reduce uncontrolled turning movements and make vehicle movements more predictable.
The plan would also add or reconstruct sidewalks, bicycle lanes and shared-use paths. In several sections, bicycle lanes would be separated from traffic by grass buffers, raised separators or landscaped areas.
Bus-stop improvements, traffic-signal modifications, retaining walls and changes to some property entrances are also included in the early concept.
The project is also intended to update a plan originally selected in 2005. SHA says the revised design will account for changes in development, traffic patterns, nearby roadway projects, current design standards and public feedback. SHA will also compare the effects of the revised design with those associated with the 2005 alternative.
As the design advances, SHA plans to evaluate opportunities to limit the project’s overall width, minimize utility and property impacts, consolidate access points where appropriate, and refine sidewalk widths and locations.
General overview of the proposed design
The preliminary design would transform Route 1 from a largely auto-oriented, five-lane undivided roadway into a divided and more multimodal corridor.
South of the I-95/I-495 interchange, the plan generally maintains two through lanes in each direction. Much of the center lane would be replaced with landscaped or raised medians. Dedicated left-turn lanes would be provided at selected intersections and entrances.
Sidewalks and bicycle lanes are proposed along much of both sides of Baltimore Avenue. Most of the illustrated bike lanes are approximately five feet wide. Many would be separated from moving traffic by grass buffers, narrow raised islands or landscaped areas.
The plan also identifies several bus stops. One representative section shows a bus-stop platform with the bike lane routed behind the passenger boarding area.
Near the interstate interchange, the design changes considerably. Instead of placing bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the outside edges of Route 1—where users would encounter numerous highway ramps—the proposal places a 12-foot shared-use path in the center of the roadway. Concrete barriers would protect the path from traffic.
North of the interchange, the central facility would transition to a 10-foot roadside shared-use path continuing toward Sunnyside Avenue.
The two-page public display divides the corridor into ten representative cross-sections, labeled A through J. Each section illustrates how the roadway design would change according to available space, nearby properties, intersections, bus stops, elevation and interstate ramps.
Section A-A: Near MD 193/University Boulevard
Section A shows a compact, four-lane divided roadway near the southern project limit.
The proposed features include:
- Two travel lanes in each direction
- Travel lanes generally between 10 and 11 feet wide
- A narrow raised center median
- A five-foot bicycle lane on each side
- A five-foot sidewalk on each side
- Narrow raised separators between the bike lanes and vehicle lanes
The raised separators would provide more physical separation than a conventional painted bicycle lane.
Section B-B: Between MD 193 and Cherokee Street – Commercial area north of MD 193
(from Section B introduces a wider and more landscaped boulevard treatment.
The proposed features include:
- Two travel lanes in each direction
- A landscaped center median approximately 10 feet wide
- Bicycle lanes on both sides
- Sidewalks on both sides
- Grass or landscaped buffers between bicycle facilities and traffic
- Space for trees within the center median
This section would create greater separation between opposing traffic and provide a greener appearance along the commercial corridor.
Section C-C: Delaware Street to Fox Street area – Bus-stop section
Section C is similar to Section B but includes a dedicated passenger boarding area.
The proposed features include:
- Two travel lanes in each direction
- A landscaped center median
- Bicycle lanes on both sides
- Sidewalks on both sides
- An approximately eight-foot bus-stop platform
- A bicycle lane routed behind the bus-stop platform
The design appears to allow the bus to stop along the travel lane rather than entering a separate pull-off bay. Routing the bike lane behind the platform could reduce direct conflicts between buses and bicyclists.
The design of crossings between the sidewalk, bike lane and boarding platform will need to be refined as the project advances.
Section D-D: Indian Lane to the area south of Hollywood Road – Typical divided roadway
Section D shows another four-lane divided configuration.
The proposed features include:
- Two travel lanes in each direction
- A narrower raised center median
- Bicycle lanes on both sides
- Sidewalks on both sides
- Grass buffers separating bicycle and pedestrian facilities from traffic
The center median is narrower than those shown in Sections B and C, likely reflecting more limited space. However, sidewalks and bicycle lanes remain on both sides.
Section E-E: Immediately south of Hollywood Road Northbound left-turn lane and retaining walls
Section E appears in an area where vehicle access and changes in elevation require a more constrained layout.
The proposed features include:
- Two through lanes in each direction
- A dedicated northbound left-turn lane
- Bicycle lanes on both sides
- Sidewalks on both sides
- Grass buffers where space permits
- Retaining walls along both sides
In this location, the center portion of the roadway is used for a designated left-turn lane rather than a continuous landscaped median.
Retaining walls would help fit the widened roadway, sidewalks and bicycle facilities into an area with limited space and elevation differences beside adjacent properties.
Section F-F: Hollywood Road to Lackawanna Street – Southbound left-turn lane
Section F provides another targeted turning-lane arrangement.
The proposed features include:
- Two through lanes in each direction
- A dedicated southbound left-turn lane
- Bicycle lanes on both sides
- Sidewalks on both sides
- Grass or landscaped buffers
The direction of the designated center turn lane changes according to the nearby intersection, entrance or driveway it is intended to serve.
Section G-G: Approaching Cherry Hill Road and the interstate interchange
Section G begins the transition toward the I-95/I-495 interchange.
The proposed features include:
- Two through lanes in each direction
- A dedicated northbound left-turn lane
- A left-turn-lane taper
- A narrow median
- Bicycle lanes on both sides
- Sidewalks on both sides
- A wider grass buffer on one side
- Retaining or existing landscape walls
The roadway becomes wider in this section to accommodate additional turning movements. Despite the constraints, the plan continues bicycle and pedestrian facilities along both sides.
Section H-H: Entering the I-95/I-495 interchange area
Section H marks a major change in the pedestrian and bicycle design.
The proposed features include:
- Multiple northbound and southbound travel lanes
- A dedicated southbound right-turn lane
- A 12-foot shared-use path in the center of the roadway
- Concrete protective barriers on both sides of the shared-use path
- An outside sidewalk on at least one side
The center shared-use path would accommodate both pedestrians and bicyclists.
Locating the path in the median is intended to avoid conflicts along the outer edges of Route 1, where vehicles enter and leave the interstate ramps.
Section I-I: Through the interchange
Section I continues the protected central path through the interchange.
The proposed features include:
- Multiple through lanes in both directions
- A southbound right-turn lane
- A northbound right-turn lane
- A 12-foot center shared-use path
- Concrete barriers on both sides of the path
The arrangement would separate bicyclists and pedestrians from vehicles using the interstate ramps.
As the design advances, SHA will need to provide more detail about how people will safely enter and leave the center path, cross ramp movements and transition back to facilities along the side of Baltimore Avenue.
Section J-J: North of the I 495 interchange toward Sunnyside Avenue
Section J shows the roadway after it passes through the interchange.
The proposed features include:
- Multiple travel lanes
- A landscaped center median
- A 10-foot roadside shared-use path
- A grass buffer between the path and the roadway
- Trees and additional landscaped areas
At this point, the center shared-use path would transition to a path along the side of Route 1.
Other proposed improvements
In addition to the ten cross-sections, the overall plan identifies:
- Roadway resurfacing and widening
- New and reconstructed curbs
- Sidewalk construction
- Bicycle lanes and shared-use paths
- Grass and landscaped areas
- Pavement removal at selected locations
- Retaining walls
- Existing traffic signals and proposed signal modifications
- Dedicated left- and right-turn lanes
- Multiple bus-stop locations
- Changes to some commercial entrances and access points
- Improvements near Hollywood Road, Cherry Hill Road, Edgewood Road and IKEA Center Boulevard
- A protected walking and bicycling connection through the interstate interchange
Environmental and community considerations
Because the project involves federal and state transportation requirements, the design will be reviewed for potential effects on the natural, cultural and human environment.
The workshop materials identify possible considerations involving wetlands, floodplains, surface water, wildlife, endangered species, historic properties, archaeological sites, parks, community facilities, nearby businesses, land use, noise, air quality and hazardous materials.
The project team must examine ways to avoid or minimize impacts and consider mitigation when impacts cannot be avoided.
Important issues for residents to review
Because the project remains at an early stage, residents and business owners may want to examine several issues carefully:
- How the medians could affect access to businesses and neighborhoods
- Which entrances or driveways may be consolidated or changed
- Whether designated turn lanes are provided at the right locations
- How pedestrians will cross Route 1
- Whether bicycle lanes are sufficiently protected
- How passengers will cross bicycle lanes at bus stops
- Whether bus shelters and accessible boarding areas will be provided
- How users will enter and leave the center shared-use path
- How crossings will operate at interstate ramps
- Whether sidewalks and buffers are wide enough in high-pedestrian areas
- Where trees, lighting and landscaping will be installed
- Potential impacts on private property
- The extent of utility relocation and retaining-wall construction
- How access to businesses and neighborhoods would be maintained during construction
How residents can provide input
The project is still at the 5% design stage, so comments submitted now can help SHA refine the proposal before the design becomes more advanced.
Residents, business owners, pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders and motorists are encouraged to review the plans and identify concerns at specific locations. Useful comments could address a difficult crossing, unsafe turning movement, missing sidewalk connection, bus-stop concern, driveway-access issue or location where a median might create access problems.
Residents can review project information and available materials on the official Route 1 Improvement Project website.
Comments and questions may also be sent directly to the project team:
Lindsay Bobian, Project Manager
Email: lbobian@mdot.maryland.gov
Holly Pearl, Community Relations Manager
Email: hpearl@mdot.maryland.gov
The June 24 workshop materials state that SHA welcomes feedback and invited participants to speak with project representatives or submit written comments.
When providing feedback, residents should identify the exact intersection, business, driveway, bus stop or portion of Route 1 involved. Specific comments will be more helpful than general statements as SHA evaluates roadway width, turn lanes, medians, property access, sidewalks, bike facilities and interchange connections.
Overall, the proposal would significantly change how this section of Baltimore Avenue functions. It would retain the road’s important role as a regional transportation route while adding more defined turning movements, continuous walking and bicycling facilities, transit accommodations, landscaped medians and greater separation among different roadway users.
However, this is not the final design. Continued public participation will be important as SHA evaluates community concerns, environmental effects, engineering constraints and property impacts.
























