At Monday night’s meeting, the College Park City Council will discuss the proposed scope of a comprehensive Public Safety Assessment. The study is intended to give the Council and the community current, independent information about the public safety services operating in College Park, their effectiveness and cost, existing service gaps, opportunities for stronger coordination, and possible service models for the future.
This discussion does not mean that the Council has decided to establish a municipal police department or replace the services currently provided by Prince George’s County. The immediate question is whether the proposed study is broad and balanced enough to give the City the information it needs before considering any significant policy, operational, or budget decisions.
Why Is the City Considering an Updated Study?
In 2018, the Police Foundation completed an assessment of public safety and police services in College Park. That study examined policing models, staffing, oversight, technology, and the City’s contractual relationship with the Prince George’s County Police Department. After reviewing the findings, the Council decided to continue using the contract-based policing model.
Much has changed since 2018. Maryland has adopted new policing accountability laws and requirements. Personnel, retirement, insurance, equipment, vehicle, training, compliance, and technology costs have increased. Police agencies across the region are experiencing recruitment and retention challenges. Community expectations have also evolved, with greater interest in transparency, de-escalation, behavioral-health responses, prevention, community policing, and alternatives to traditional law-enforcement responses.
College Park also has an unusually complex public safety environment. Prince George’s County Police, University of Maryland Police, Maryland State Police, Maryland-National Capital Park Police, Metro Transit Police, and other agencies have overlapping or location-specific responsibilities within the City. College Park also funds a contract-police program and operates code enforcement, automated traffic enforcement, camera systems, animal control, emergency management, and other public safety functions.
An updated assessment would examine how these services work together and whether residents are receiving the most effective, accountable, and financially sustainable services possible.
Review of Existing Public Safety Services
The first part of the proposed study would create a comprehensive inventory of the public safety services currently available in College Park. This would include regular Prince George’s County police services, University of Maryland police services, City-funded contract officers, code enforcement, automated enforcement, public safety cameras, emergency planning, and other related programs.
The review would examine contracts, memoranda of understanding, budgets, staffing levels, patrol coverage, special assignments, reporting structures, and any limitations affecting officer availability. It would also analyze available information about calls for service, response times, crime trends, nuisance activity, traffic safety, geographic coverage, staffing, and other performance measures.
One important goal would be to identify the strengths of the current system, along with gaps, service limitations, unclear responsibilities, and opportunities for better coordination.
Four Public Safety Models to Be Examined
The proposed study would not begin with a predetermined outcome. Instead, the consultant would compare several approaches and provide the Council with costs, benefits, risks, staffing requirements, implementation challenges, and expected outcomes.
1. Enhance the Current Contract-Policing Model
The first option would examine improvements to the existing arrangement with Prince George’s County Police. Possibilities could include additional full-time contract officers, expanded part-time coverage, clearer performance and reporting expectations, better deployment information, and more structured coordination between the City and County police.
The study would independently evaluate the effectiveness and value of the current contract program and determine whether modifications could provide better neighborhood coverage, accountability, and community policing.
2. Expand Community-Oriented Public Safety Services
The second option would consider expanding civilian or nontraditional public safety support. These services could help strengthen neighborhood networks, support Neighborhood Watch-style programs, improve public safety communications, coordinate cameras and automated enforcement, assist with emergency management, and connect residents with appropriate services.
This part of the study would also examine behavioral-health and crisis-response programs that could respond to certain situations with or instead of police officers. The goal would be to determine which calls require a sworn officer and which could be handled more effectively by trained civilian, mental-health, social-service, or community-based personnel.
3. Strengthen Coordination Among Existing Agencies
The third option would focus on better collaboration among the agencies already serving College Park, particularly Prince George’s County Police and University of Maryland Police.
The study would examine opportunities for improved data sharing, geographic coordination, joint problem-solving, targeted enforcement, community policing, and clearer responsibility for calls occurring in areas where jurisdictions overlap. College Park’s relationship with the University and multiple police agencies is different from that of many other municipalities, so any future model should take advantage of these existing partnerships.
4. Evaluate an Independent Municipal Police Department
The fourth option would provide a realistic assessment of what would be required to establish and operate a College Park municipal police department.
This analysis would include start-up and annual operating costs, tax-differential assumptions, staffing, recruitment and retention, salaries and benefits, retirement costs, accreditation, training, vehicles, equipment, body-worn cameras, dispatch, records management, insurance, liability, facilities, legal authority, and transition planning.
The consultant would also examine the challenges of recruiting officers in a competitive regional market where hiring bonuses can range from $5,000 to $25,000 and agencies offer specialized retirement plans and other benefits. The study would identify the facilities, technology, policies, organizational structure, and multiyear funding needed to operate a department.
Including this option in the study does not commit the City to creating a police department. It would allow the Council and residents to understand its true costs, benefits, risks, and practical requirements before deciding whether it should receive further consideration.
Independent Cost Analysis
A major component of the study would be an independent evaluation of the current and potential costs of providing police services. This analysis would go beyond salaries and include retirement obligations, insurance and liability, workers’ compensation, training, accreditation, vehicles, fuel, equipment, technology, data storage, records retention, body-worn cameras, analytics systems, facilities, and administrative support.
The consultant would also compare College Park with similarly situated municipalities in Prince George’s County, elsewhere in Maryland, and around the region. These comparisons would examine municipal police departments, contract-policing arrangements, hybrid models, shared services, staffing benchmarks, governance structures, costs, implementation risks, and best practices.
Community Participation
Public input will be an important part of the assessment. The proposed process would include community surveys, focus groups, discussions at existing community events, and engagement with residents, neighborhood associations, businesses, University representatives, students, landlords, County officials, police agencies, City employees, and community organizations.
The process should include residents with a wide range of views, including those who support additional police coverage and those who favor prevention, behavioral-health services, or alternatives to traditional policing.
The consultant would also review comments previously received through City surveys, budget discussions, Council meetings, and earlier public safety conversations. Staff would provide regular information to the community as the assessment moves forward.
Proposed Timeline
Under the preliminary schedule, police agencies will present current statistics, staffing information, service conditions, and opportunities for collaboration during fall 2026. Staff would then prepare and release a solicitation reflecting the Council’s direction on data, performance measures, service models, costs, collaboration, and public participation.
The City would review consultant proposals during winter 2026. Community engagement, data collection, and analysis of existing conditions would occur from winter 2026 through spring 2027.
Initial findings and service-model options would be presented to the Council in spring 2027, followed by draft recommendations. The final report and presentation are tentatively scheduled for May 2027.
Near-term recommendations could be considered during the FY2028 budget process. Longer-term decisions about public safety spending or major structural changes could be considered as part of FY2029 planning.
Financial Impact
The FY2027 budget includes approximately $30,000 to begin the assessment. The final cost will depend on the approved scope and the proposals received from qualified consulting firms.
The proposed scope includes research, comparisons with peer communities, public outreach, performance measures, analysis of facilities and staffing, evaluation of different service models, and recommendations for implementation and phasing.
What Will the Council Decide?
At Monday’s meeting, the Council will be asked to review the proposed scope and provide direction to staff. Councilmembers may suggest changes, identify additional questions, or confirm that the study should examine the current contract program, community-oriented services, enhanced agency collaboration, hybrid options, and the potential cost and structure of a municipal police department.
Staff recommends directing the City to engage a consultant to prepare the updated assessment, building upon the 2018 Police Foundation study while incorporating current data, laws, costs, community expectations, and public safety practices.
No final decision about changing College Park’s policing model will be made at this meeting. The goal is to begin a careful, transparent, and fact-based process so that future decisions are based on reliable data, meaningful community participation, realistic costs, and a clear understanding of the available options.